Overclocked Gaming Performance
-
MSI 790FX-G70 (3.7GHz CPU, 2.6GHz NB, 1,600MHz Mem)
-
Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P (3.7GHz CPU, 2.4GHz NB, 1,600MHz Mem)
-
DFI LANParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 (3.6GHz, 2.4GHz NB, 1,600MHz Mem)
Frames Per Second - higher is better
-
MSI 790FX-G70 (3.7GHz CPU, 2.6GHz NB, 1,600MHz Mem)
-
Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P (3.7GHz CPU, 2.4GHz NB, 1,600MHz Mem)
-
DFI LANParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 (3.6GHz, 2.4GHz NB, 1,600MHz Mem)
Frames Per Second - higher is better
When overclocked the performance difference is even more pronounced, where the DFI lags behind by anywhere between a couple and several frames per second depending on the game.
Image Editing, Video Encoding and Multitasking
Real world applications benchmarks such as the ones below are a great way to see the benefits an overclock provides for everyday PC use. Some motherboards respond better than others when overclocking even their CPUs are clocked at the same speeds and in the gaming performance tests we found that the Renaissance was a particularly happy bunny when overclocked.
-
MSI 790FX-G70 (3.7GHz CPU, 2.6GHz NB, 1,600MHz Mem)
-
Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P (3.7GHz CPU, 2.4GHz NB, 1,600MHz Mem)
-
DFI LANParty DK 790FXB-M3H5
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Seconds (lower is better)
-
MSI 790FX-G70 (3.7GHz CPU, 2.6GHz NB, 1,600MHz Mem)
-
DFI LANParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 (3.6GHz, 2.4GHz NB, 1,600MHz Mem)
-
Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P (3.7GHz CPU, 2.4GHz NB, 1,600MHz Mem)
Seconds (lower is better)
-
Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P (3.7GHz CPU, 2.4GHz NB, 1,600MHz Mem)
-
MSI 790FX-G70 (3.7GHz CPU, 2.6GHz NB, 1,600MHz Mem)
-
DFI LANParty DK 790FXB-M3H5 (3.6GHz, 2.4GHz NB, 1,600MHz Mem)
Seconds (lower is better)
The same goes for real world performance when overclocked too - the slight lack of CPU performance and slower memory clock and inherent bandwidth mean that the DFI board is closer to the Gigabyte board, however at least the Gigabyte manages to pull it back in multi-tasking, unlike the DFI.
Want to comment? Please log in.